Friday, June 12, 2015

Feds driven to admit dozens of Land Rover seizures were wrong

 I remember hearing about this last year.
Read this and tell me how some asshole read the vin numbers wrong.
I ain't buying that bullshit.

It's too bad they can't be sued right the fuck back now for emotional distress,illegal seizure and generally being absolute douche bags.


Feds driven to admit dozens of Land Rover seizures were wrong

 

Vintage Land Rovers that looked so good they fooled the federal government into seizing them are being returned to their owners this week after a legal nightmare that began nearly a year ago.
Dozens of the iconic Defender models were seized by the Department of Homeland Security after U.S. buyers purchased them from abroad and had them shipped here. Vehicles that do not comply with safety and emissions standards cannot be purchased from foreign sellers unless they are 25 years or older, and therefore exempt from the regulations. North Carolina lawyer and Land Rover enthusiast Will Hedrick, who has represented more than two dozen Defender owners free of charge, believes investigators mistook the vehicles for newer models.

I had seven law enforcement officers block my driveway and take my Land Rover, with bulletproof vests and guns in holsters,” recalled Jennifer Brinkley, who paid $60,000 for her classic Land Rover Defender. The North Carolina mother’s dream ride, inspired by memories of African safaris. 
Seized under civil forfeiture laws, Brinkley's 1985 Land Rover languished at a Williamston impound lot until Thursday, when she went with attorney Christina Clodfelter, who worked with Hedrick, to retrieve it.
Hedrick said if he hadn't agreed to work pro bono, the government might never have been forced to admit its mistake. In civil forfeitures, he said, innocent property owners often decide to cut their losses.
“It just gets too expensive,” Hedrick said. “You’re going to spend more money trying to get your property back than what it’s worth. So, people just write it off.”
In the case of the seized Defenders, Hedrick believes investigators may have misread some of the Vehicle Identification Numbers (VINs) and mistaken them for newer models. He also said it’s easy to install new parts on old Defenders, making them appear newer than they are.
Federal authorities declined to comment on specific cases. However, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Raleigh, N.C., told Fox News in an email that 25 seized vehicles are being returned to owners around the country.

Seized at gunpoint. You damn right they had to use overwhelming force or they might have gotten shot themselves.
Thieving fucking bastards.

Fuck, the Feds man.
I would almost bet money that someone had plans to get a couple of those somehow.




Hell, I'd like to have one!

So, someone explain to me how hard it must have been to get someone that can see straight to go down and read the vehicle identification numbers again? It took a fucking year to get this straightened out.
And what about the rest of them?
If they are all the same vintage then why aren't they releasing ALL OF THEM?

Some people are still gonna get fucked over.


 

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

"Vehicles that do not comply with safety and emissions standards cannot be purchased from foreign sellers.."

Government Motors wants the monopoly on selling unsafe cars.

and as for it taking a year.. the process is the punishment.

-fjord

Fair Use Notice

Fair Use Statement: This site may contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not have been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: “http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml” If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.