Bearing Arms and others are spreading the news like wildfire.
There is video too.
They have been after the customer lists.They have been intimidating people and harassing this business owner for over a week to get them. The owner got a temporary restraining order aginst the ATF and they flat out ignored it and broke the lock on the door to get in.
If this doesn't send a chill down your spine then you need to wake the fuck up.
If you had even the slightest hope that The Rule Of Law still existed in this country, there is the proof to the contrary you can see with your own eyes.
There is only one reason the ATF wants those names on that list.
I do believe the avoidable has been willfully cast aside and that the judicial system in this country has become a facade for the government to hide behind only when it finds it to be convenient.
When it doesn't find it convenient, it just plows ahead with it's agenda and covers it up afterwards.
Tyranny is alive and well here .
What comes next is anyone's guess but outright open rebellion just got moved up a notch on the calendar.
What these people don't seem to grasp is that if they want so badly to turn millions of Americans into criminals, is that by definition, criminals have no respect for the law.
What comes around goes around will soon be the norm.
There is this thing called diminished return on investment and another thing called The Point Of No Return.
I believe we are now at an event horizon and that both are staring us right in the face.
It was later learned that the raid was, in fact, legal, as the ATF went to the judge who issued the restraining order and had it lifted, claiming that the 80% lowers in question were in fact, "firearms".
Contrary to their own definition that an 80% complete lower receiver is not a complete firearm.
This isn't over by a long shot.
Fair Use Notice
Fair Use Statement: This site may contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not have been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: “http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml” If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.