He has an immunity deal with the Feebs but is also under further scrutiny from civil lawsuits in which that immunity does not apply.
In response to these other lawsuits, his attorneys have announced he is going to refuse to answer any and all questions, invoking his 5th Amendment right against self incrimination.
That alone speaks volumes to me and what I personally take away from that is that Hillary Clinton
has somethings she definitely does not want to become public knowledge concerning this issue.
I'm also quite certain that Mr. Pagliano is aware that there is a long list of former Clinton associates who have come to unfortunate early and sometimes mysterious ends.
Washington (CNN)The lawyer for a former State Department IT specialist told a federal judge his client's immunity deal with the Department of Justice does not cover testimony in civil lawsuits and he will refuse to answer questions at an upcoming deposition.
The lawyer further requested that the details of that immunity deal be provided as a sealed, "ex parte" document, concealing them from the public.
D.C. Circuit Court Judge Emmet Sullivan had requested language of Bryan Pagliano's immunity deal after learning that he intended to take the Fifth at a deposition that was originally scheduled to take place Monday but has since been postponed.
Pagliano, who helped set up and maintain Hillary Clinton's private email server, was subpoenaed by the conservative legal watchdog group Judicial Watch as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State Department.
He was offered an immunity deal late last year in order to offer testimony as part of an ongoing FBI investigation into the email server.
But Pagliano's lawyer, Mark MacDougall, said in a court filing Tuesday that DOJ "has not authorized a grant of immunity for Mr. Pagliano in connection with any other matter, including this civil case."
"The potential for self-incrimination here is sufficient to justify Mr. Pagliano's intention to assert his Fifth Amendment rights," MacDougall added, noting, "Mr. Pagliano's prospective deposition will inevitably cover matters that might 'furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute.'"
"Indeed," MacDougall continued, "the mere fact that the government was willing to offer Pagliano 'use' immunity here in exchange for his testimony indicates that his fear of prosecution is more than fanciful or speculative."
Judicial Watch, the plaintiff in the FOIA case, has until Friday to argue for the immunity deal to be made public.