Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Still Think Your Medical Records Are Confidential?


Texas: Med Board lets DEA sneak peeks at patient records

The Drug Enforcement Administration has been sifting through hundreds of supposedly private medical files, looking for Texas doctors and patients to prosecute without the use of warrants.

Instead, the agents are tricking doctors and nurses into thinking they’re with the Texas Medical Board. When that doesn’t work, they’re sending doctors subpoenas demanding medical records without court approval.

The DEA can’t even count how many times it has resorted to the practice nationwide. A spokesman estimated it was in the thousands.

But, as a legal brief filed last week points out, lawyers for the federal government can’t find a single case in which a court has “authorized the use of such a broad array of patient information with such a sparse record as to why it needs such information.”

Earlier this year, a federal judge in Texas did just that, setting up a showdown in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals over whether the DEA needs a reason to go rummaging through private medical records in search of pill mills and prescription drug abusers.

Without the legalese, the issue is simple: How good a reason does the DEA need to get access to medical records? The DEA doesn’t think it needs much of one.

Attorneys for Dallas-area doctors Joseph and Abbas Zadeh argue “the DEA should not be allowed to circumvent the requirements of a warrant, and should be required to show probable cause.” Failing that, they should at least have to justify their intrusions to a judge who’s acting as more than a rubber stamp.

The DEA’s practice of avoiding warrant requirements has produced this absurdity: If you have a prescription for Adderall or OxyContin, you might be safer getting your drugs on the street than through your own doctor.

This is why I love my doctor. he is old school and doesn't use electronic record keeping.
If the DEA wanted to go sniffing through his records they had best bring a lunch because they would be doing a lot of paper shuffling.

He also doesn't ask about things that do not have anything to do with why I am there.

As far as I can see from this, the DEA should have it's ass spanked, hard, for violating peoples privacy without cause.

I am not getting a warm fuzzy knowing these assclowns have nothing better to do than go sniffing through supposedly private medical records looking for a reason to justify their existence.


Stackz O Magz said...

Apparently the DEA has freaked a lot doctors out with threats of license suspension. When my wife was down in her back recently with MRI verified bulged discs and nerve pain, the first doctor we went to would not prescribe her anything for pain except ibuprofen. Here we were with a solid insurance plan, full time employment, a legit MRI reflecting her symptoms, a woman in pain, and they looked at us like we were fucking junkies because she asked for a few god damned Norco's so she could fucking function until they could proceed with her injections. They couldn't even write her a pain script to cover her 4 fucking days until she could get back in for injections. We told that doctor to shove it up his candy ass, that we would not be returning to him for treatment, and that he could take any and all expenses for that first visit that did absolutely nothing to treat my wife and recoup them rectally as well. We called our family Dr, and what do you know? He had no issue writing her a script for her pain and has been her primary care until we can get her in to see a specialist. These motherfuckers ain't gonna stop prying. Like the DEA don't know who's running fucking pill mills and who's running a legit practice. Ninja please...

Moe said...

Same shit around here with pain meds. We don't abuse them, but on occasion need pain relief. A shot of ibuprofen is about the best you can hope for.


Fair Use Notice

Fair Use Statement: This site may contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not have been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: “” If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.