Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Amazingly Enough, There Weren't Seventeen Innocent By Standers Shot By Mistake

Also no mention if this assclown has a few new knots on his head.

NYPD officer arrested for driving drunk, smashing into cars in Brooklyn





Gary Hershorn/REUTERS

Shieed Haniff, a 30-year NYPD veteran, allegedly ran a police stop while driving drunk.

A city cop was arrested for driving drunk, smashing into cars and speeding through a police stop as fellow officers gave chase, authorities said Monday.

The alleged intoxicated ride by Shieed Haniff, 30, ended Sunday minutes before midnight when he was stopped in East New York, Brooklyn.

Police saw Haniff drive erratically and hit a car, before making a u-turn and crashing into another car, causing injuries for occupants in both vehicles, court papers alleged.

The seven-year NYPD veteran then drove off and plowed through a traffic stop with “police jumping out of the way,” the document said.

( My reaction to this.)


Cops charged Haniff with leaving the scene of an accident, DWI, reckless driving and refusing to take a breath test. He was released without bail, but his license was revoked.

I notice there are no attempted murder charges like there would be for anybody else who made those cops jump out of the way.



Even when these people go completely off the deep end they get breaks no one else would get.

3 comments:

Ro said...

Erm, shouldn't he have been shot four times in the back and once in the head. Or does that apply only in DC?

SiGraybeard said...

In NYC they usually shoot 8 or 10 bystanders, then the suspect gets beat senseless and a broomstick run up his ass.

Anonymous said...

I thought muslims weren't supposed to drink? I can see why!
Shieed Haniff? That's not Irish.

Fair Use Notice

Fair Use Statement: This site may contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not have been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: “http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml” If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.